 |
| Research article summary (published 30 Mar 2003): |
Wanted: fully operational definitions of dissociations in single-case studies.
Full Abstract
In contrast to the careful consideration given to the issue of what we can infer from dissociations in single-case studies, the more basic question of how we decide whether a dissociation is present has been relatively neglected. Proposals are made for fully operational definitions of a deficit, classical and strong dissociations, and double dissociations. In developing these definitions it was assumed that they should be based on the use of inferential rather than descriptive statistical methods. The scope of these definitions is limited to typical single-case studies in which patients are compared to control samples of a modest size. The operational definition of a classical dissociation incorporates a requirement that a patient's performance on Task X is significantly different from Task Y, in addition to the "standard" requirement that the patient has a deficit on Task X and is within normal limits on Task Y. We ran a simulation to estimate the Type I error rates when the criteria for dissociations are applied and found these to be low (Type I errors were defined as identifying an individual from the control population as having a dissociation). The inferential methods for testing whether the various criteria are met make use of t-distributions. These methods are contrasted with the widespread use of z to test for a deficit or a difference between tasks. In the latter approach the statistics of the control sample are treated as parameters; this is not appropriate when, as is normally the case, the control sample size is modest in size.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Crawford, John R (JR); Garthwaite, Paul H (PH); Gray, Colin D (CD);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. j.crawford@abdn.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comment; Journal Article; Review
Journal: Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior (Cortex), published in Italy. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Apr; vol 39 (issue 2) : pp 357-70
Dates: Created 2003/06/04; Completed 2003/06/30; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 12784893, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentOn: Cortex. 2003 Feb;39(1):1-7. (PMID: 12627749)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.