Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 27 Feb 2002):

Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size.

Full Abstract

Visual marking makes it possible to ignore old items during search. In a typical study, old items are previewed 1 s before adding an equal number of new items, one of which is the target. Previewing half of the items reduces the search slope relating response time (RT) to overall set size by half. However, this manipulation sometimes only reduces overall RT but not search slope (Experiment 1). By orthogonally varying the numbers of old and new items, Experiment 2 shows that old and new set sizes interactively affect visual marking. Given a constant new set size, the size of the old set has negligible effect on RT. However, increasing the new set size reduces the preview benefit in overall RT. Experiment 3 shows that this reduction may be restricted to paradigms that use temporal segregation cues. Studies should vary old and new set size orthogonally to avoid missing a visual marking effect where one may be present.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Jiang, Yuhong (Y); Chun, Marvin M (MM); Marks, Lawrence E (LE);

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA. yuhong(-atsign-)mit.edu

Grants: DC00271-15 (Agency:United States NIDCD)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-Mar; vol 28 (issue 2) : pp 293-302

Dates: Created 2002/03/25; Completed 2002/09/06; Revised 2007/11/14;

PMID: 11911385, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

ErratumIn: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2002 May;28(3):410.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index