The value of clinical judgement analysis for improving the quality of doctors' prescribing decisions.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Many initiatives are taken to improve prescribing decisions. Educational strategies for doctors have been effective in at least 50% of cases. Some reflection on one's own performance seems to be a common feature of the most effective strategies. So far, such reflections have mainly focused on the observed outcomes of the doctors' decisions, i.e. on what doctors do in practice. Studies in other fields have shown that another form of feedback based on the analysis of judgements may be useful as well.

OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of the study were to discuss the principles underlying clinical judgement analysis, give examples of its use in the medical context, and discuss its potential for improving prescribing decisions.

RESULTS:
Clinical judgement analysis can look behind the outcome of a decision to the underlying decision process. Carefully constructed or selected case material is required for this analysis. Combining feedback on outcomes with feedback based on clinical judgement analysis offers doctors insight both in what they do, and why or when they do it. It may reveal determinants of decision making which are not available through unaided introspection. Interventions using this combination of feedback for improving doctors' prescribing behaviour have been (partly) successful in 4 cases and unsuccessful in one case.

CONCLUSIONS:
Clinical judgement analysis gives doctors a structured reflection on the decision-making policy, and can help them to improve their future decisions. It may be especially useful for groups of doctors who try to work towards a consensus policy. The approach is not very helpful when simple decision rules are appropriate.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Denig, Petra (P); Wahlström, Rolf (R); de Saintonge, Mark Chaput (MC); Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora (F);

Affiliation: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. p.denig(-atsign-)med.rug.nl

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Medical education (Med Educ), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-Aug; vol 36 (issue 8) : pp 770-80

Dates: Created 2002/08/22; Completed 2002/11/22; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12191061, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.