|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2003): |
Validation of a decision regret scale.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions.
METHODS:
A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures.
RESULTS:
The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to -0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret:
F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS:
The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Brehaut, Jamie C (JC); O'Connor, Annette M (AM); Wood, Timothy J (TJ); Hack, Thomas F (TF); Siminoff, Laura (L); Gordon, Elisa (E); Feldman-Stewart, Deb (D);
Affiliation: Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jbrehaut(-atsign-)ohri.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Studies
Journal: Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making (Med Decis Making), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: -2003 Jul-Aug; vol 23 (issue 4) : pp 281-92
Dates: Created 2003/08/20; Completed 2003/10/08; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 12926578, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.