The two paradigms of persistence.

Full Abstract

Persistence refers to the extent to which an individual pursues reinforcement that is no longer available. The most common generalization regarding persistence is the partial reinforcement extinction effect, which states that partial, rather than continuous, reinforcement creates the greatest level of persistence. Although the partial reinforcement effect is the most common effect in humans, exceptions exist, namely the generalized and the reversed partial reinforcement effect. Since the 1930s, psychologists have used 2 general paradigms for studying persistence in humans:
the experimental paradigm and the cognitive/individual differences paradigm. For the experimental paradigm, the primary independent variable is the schedule of reinforcement used to establish the behavior prior to the removal of reinforcement. Explanations of persistence from the experimental perspective depend on associative principles derived from various theories of learning. By contrast, the cognitive/individual differences paradigm treats persistence as a function of trait variables, including locus of control and self-esteem, or general cognitive processes, such as cognitive dissonance or social cognition. In this article, the author reviews the status of the current literature on persistence and recommends directions for future research.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Pittenger, David J (DJ);

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 37403-2598, USA. David-Pittenger(-atsign-)utc.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Review

Journal: Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs (Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-Aug; vol 128 (issue 3) : pp 237-68

Dates: Created 2002/10/28; Completed 2003/02/21; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12401034, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.