|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2001): |
Theological discourse and the postmodern condition: the case of bioethics.
Full Abstract
Bioethics reflects--like many other disciplines--the cultural fragmentation and the complexity of what has come to be known as the postmodern condition. The case of bioethics is particularly acute because of its epistemological indeterminacy and the moral pluralism characterizing postliberal societies. A provisional solution to this situation is the retrieval of a neo-Kantian version of ethical formalism in which concern for a consensus on rules replaces universal dialogue on moral content. The article analyzes the possible consequences of this solution with reference to theological ethics. In particular, the reduction of ethical rationality to a function of political regulation on the one hand, and the implicit legitimization of ethical relativism on the other, push any theological contribution to bioethics to the margins. The central methodological issue for the articulation of theological discourse in bioethics is how to avoid the pitfall of privatism while creating the conditions for ethical dialogue across different traditions.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Dell'Oro, Roberto (R);
Affiliation: Georgetown University Medical Center, NW Washington, DC 20007, USA. delloror(-atsign-)gunet.georgetown.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Medicine, health care, and philosophy (Med Health Care Philos), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-; vol 5 (issue 2) : pp 127-36
Dates: Created 2002/08/09; Completed 2002/10/16; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 12168988, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics.
29 Nov 2007 - Ethicists urge caution over emotive power of brain scans.
17 May 2005 - Ethics charter from American Academy of Pain Medicine.
29 Apr 2005 - Honoring experience in moral discourse.
30 Dec 2004 - 1980-2005: bioethics then and now.
30 Dec 2005 - [Discursiveness and co-authority in clinical ethics]
30 Aug 2005 - Balancing in ethical deliberation: superior to specification and casuistry.
29 Sep 2006 - Bioethics: the intersection of private and public decisions.
30 Jul 2004 - Building stairs into slippery slopes. An interview with Arthur Caplan, Director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA, USA). Interview by Holger Breithaupt and Caroline Hadley.
30 Dec 2004 - Ethics education and value prioritization among members of U.S. hospital ethics committees.
29 Nov 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.