|
Research article summary:
Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response.
Abstract Extract: Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Sep
in Journal: Exp Brain Res
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Exp Brain Res.
2002 Sep;146(1):54-9
Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response.
Poliakoff E, Spence C, O'Boyle DJ, McGlone FP, Cody FW
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK. ellen@poliakoff.org.uk
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual response inhibition effects. This confound can be circumvented by using a target-target paradigm in which participants respond to all stimuli. Here, we compared IOR magnitude from tactile cue-target and target-target tasks involving identical interstimulus intervals of 1,400 and 1,800 ms. Reaction times were measured using a foot pedal toe-lift response and a vocal response. Tactile IOR was observed using both modes of response, demonstrating IOR for the first time using a non-spatial, vocal response. Moreover, IOR effects were significantly smaller in target-target compared to cue-target conditions, thereby confirming the existence of the response inhibition confound.
PMID : 12192578 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| E | Poliakoff | E |
| C | Spence | C |
| D J | O'Boyle | DJ |
| F P | McGlone | FP |
| F W J | Cody | FW |
Affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK. ellen@poliakoff.org.uk
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Adolescent
- Adult
- Attention - physiology
- Cues
- Female
- Foot - physiology
- Humans
- Male
- Movement - physiology
- Reaction Time - physiology
- Speech
- Superior Colliculi - physiology
- Touch - physiology
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:circumvented, compared, conditions, confirming, confound, contribution, cue, demonstrating, effects, existence, eye, first, foot, identical, inhibition, interstimulus, intervals, involving, ior, lift, location, magnitude, manual, measured, modes, moreover, movement, ms, non, observed, overestimated, paradigm, participants, pedal, preceding, presented, previous, programming, reaction, refers, respond, responses, return, same, slowing, smaller, spatial, stimuli, studies, tactile, target, tasks, thereby, times, toe, vocal
|