 |
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2003): |
Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life--Updated.
Full Abstract
CONTEXT:
End-of-life care remains a challenging and complex activity in critical care units. There is little information concerning the influence of administrative models of care delivery on end-of-life care.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare and contrast end-of-life care delivery in intensive care units using "semiclosed," "open," and "closed" administrative models.
DESIGN:
Ethnographic study of three critical care units.
SETTING:
University hospitals in the United States and New Zealand.
SUBJECTS:
Approximately 600 physicians, nurses, allied health personnel, patients, family members, and friends.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Ethnographic observations were made at three sites for 75, 3, and 10 wks, respectively. Eighty end-of-life care episodes were observed. The interactions among care personnel and families varied according to the administrative model, depending on whether surgeons or intensivists had primary patient responsibility. This led to differential timing on the shift from "cure" to "comfort," and differential decision-making power for families.
CONCLUSIONS:
End-of-life care varies according to the administrative model. When surgeons have primary responsibility for the patient, the most important goal is defeating death. When intensivists have sole patient responsibility, scarce resources are considered and quality of life is a significant variable. Discussions about improving the way end-of-life decisions are carried out in intensive care units rarely consider the administrative models and personal, professional, and national values affecting such decisions. To improve care at the end of life, we must critically examine these features.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Cassell, Joan (J); Buchman, Timothy G (TG); Streat, Stephen (S); Stewart, Ronald M (RM);
Affiliation: Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Grants: NR05124 (Agency:United States NINR)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Corrected and Republished Article; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Journal: Critical care medicine (Crit Care Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-May; vol 31 (issue 5) : pp 1551-7; discussion 1557-9
Dates: Created 2003/05/28; Completed 2003/06/16; Revised 2007/11/14;
PMID: 12771632, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: Evid Based Nurs. 2004 Apr;7(2):64. (PMID: 15106648)
RepublishedFrom: Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1263-70. (PMID: 12682502)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.