Accelerated-Learning-Online.com - helping you learn faster
Home | Contact Us
Search Site:
 
Home
Learning State
Learning Process
Memory Techniques
Learning Styles
Learning Approach
Learning Challenges
Other Resources
Research Articles
Brain News
Contact Us

Research article summary:

Spit (Smokeless) Tobacco Intervention for High School Athletes: results after 1 year.

Abstract Extract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a spit tobacco (ST) intervention designed to promote ST cessation and discourage ST initiation among male high school baseball athletes. METHODS: This study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Forty-four ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003Aug in Journal: Addict Behav (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Addict Behav. 2003 Aug;28(6):1095-113

Spit (Smokeless) Tobacco Intervention for High School Athletes: results after 1 year.

Walsh MM, Hilton JF, Ellison JA, Gee L, Chesney MA, Tomar SL, Ernster VL

Room 495, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94143-1361, USA. walsh@itsa.ucsf.edu

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a spit tobacco (ST) intervention designed to promote ST cessation and discourage ST initiation among male high school baseball athletes. METHODS: This study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Forty-four randomly selected high schools in rural California were randomized within strata (prevalence of ST use and number and size of baseball teams) to either the intervention or the control group. Ninety-three percent of eligible baseball athletes participated, yielding 516 subjects in 22 intervention schools and 568 subjects in 22 control schools. Prevalences of sustained ST cessation and ST use initiation over 1 year were assessed by self-report. Multivariate logistic regression models for clustered responses were used to test the null hypotheses of no association between group and the two outcomes, adjusted for the stratified design and baseline imbalances between groups in significant predictors of ST use. RESULTS: Prevalence of cessation was 27% in intervention high schools and 14% in control high schools (odds ratio (OR)=2.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.36-3.87). The intervention was especially effective in promoting cessation among those who, at baseline, lacked confidence that they could quit (OR=6.4; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3), among freshmen (OR=15; 95% CI, 0.9-260), and among nonsmokers (OR=3.2; 95% CI, 0.9-11). There was no significant difference between groups in the prevalence of ST initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was effective in promoting ST cessation, but was ineffective in preventing initiation of ST use by nonusers.

PMID : 12834653 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]


This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First NameLastNameInitials
Margaret MWalshMM
Joan FHiltonJF
James AEllisonJA
LaurenGeeL
Margaret AChesneyMA
Scott LTomarSL
Virginia LErnsterVL

Affiliation: Room 495, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94143-1361, USA. walsh@itsa.ucsf.edu

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Category links from this article:

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adolescent
  • Baseball
  • Behavior Therapy - methods
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Education - methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Peer Group
  • Prognosis
  • School Dentistry - methods
  • Students - psychology
  • Tobacco Use Cessation - methods
  • Tobacco, Smokeless
  • Treatment Outcome
   

Related Memletics topics:

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Related Articles

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Keywords in this article:

adjusted, assessed, association, athletes, baseball, baseline, california, cessation, cluster, clustered, conclusions, confidence, controlled, designed, determine, difference, discourage, effective, efficacy, eligible, forty, four, freshmen, group, groups, high, hypotheses, imbalances, ineffective, initiation, interval, intervention, lacked, logistic, male, methods, models, multivariate, ninety, nonsmokers, null, number, objective, odds, or=, outcomes, over, participated, percent, predictors, prevalence, prevalences, preventing, promote, promoting, quit, randomized, randomly, ratio, regression, report, responses, results, rural, school, schools, selected, self, significant, size, spit, st, strata, stratified, study, subjects, sustained, teams, test, three, tobacco, trial, two, who, year, yielding

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)

© Advanogy.com 2003-2007 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us