|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2002): |
Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.
Full Abstract
Research on judgment and choice has been dominated by functionalist assumptions that depict people as either intuitive scientists animated by epistemic goals or intuitive economists animated by utilitarian ones. This article identifies 3 alternative social functionalist starting points for inquiry:
people as pragmatic politicians trying to cope with accountability demands from key constituencies in their lives, principled theologians trying to protect sacred values from secular encroachments, and prudent prosecutors trying to enforce social norms. Each functionalist framework stimulates middle-range theories that specify (a) cognitive-affective-behavioral strategies of coping with adaptive challenges and (b) the implications of these coping strategies for identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on judgmental tendencies classified as errors or biases within the dominant research programs.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Tetlock, Philip E (PE);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, USA. tetlock(-atsign-)haas.berkeley.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Review
Journal: Psychological review (Psychol Rev), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Jul; vol 109 (issue 3) : pp 451-71
Dates: Created 2002/06/28; Completed 2002/07/23; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12088240, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Do relations between judgment and epistemological beliefs differentiate between mere acceptance and critical evaluation? Comment on Latifian and Bashash (2004).
30 Jan 2006 - Frameworks for understanding emotions and their development: functionalist and dynamic systems approaches.
30 Jul 2007 - Neural processes underlying intuitive coherence judgments as revealed by fMRI on a semantic judgment task.
22 Jul 2007 - Using simulation to develop testable functionalist explanations: a case study of church survival.
30 Aug 2006 - A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
30 Aug 2003 - The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
30 Jul 2007 - Selective attention to signs of success: social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception.
9 Jan 2008 - On the speed of intuition: intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines.
29 Sep 2005 - Emotion and intuition.
30 Aug 2003 - Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
29 Nov 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.