Accelerated-Learning-Online.com - helping you learn faster
Home | Contact Us
Search Site:
 
Home
Learning State
Learning Process
Memory Techniques
Learning Styles
Learning Approach
Learning Challenges
Other Resources
Research Articles
Brain News
Contact Us

Research article summary:

Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning.

Abstract Extract:
We report three Pavlovian eyelid conditioning experiments with humans, designed to experimentally decide between elemental and configural learning theories. We used two different designs originally proposed by Redhead and Pearce (1995). In Experiments 1 ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003Mar in Journal: Psychophysiology (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Psychophysiology. 2003 Mar;40(2):226-34

Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning.

Kinder A, Lachnit H

Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. kinder@mailer.uni-marburg.de

We report three Pavlovian eyelid conditioning experiments with humans, designed to experimentally decide between elemental and configural learning theories. We used two different designs originally proposed by Redhead and Pearce (1995). In Experiments 1 and 2, three stimulus elements, A, B, and C, were presented in all possible combinations. All patterns were reinforced except for pattern ABC (A/B/C+, AB/AC/BC+, ABC-). According to elemental learning theories, response proportions on A/B/C+ trials should be smaller than on AB/AC/BC+ trials, whereas configural learning theory makes the opposite prediction. The results confirmed neither prediction. In Experiment 3, the A/B/C+, AB/AC/BC+, and ABC- trials were interspersed by D/E/F-, DE/DF/EF-, DEF+ trials. Again, neither prediction was confirmed. We suggest a modification of configural learning theory as a possible explanation of our results.

PMID : 12820863 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]


This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First NameLastNameInitials
AnnetteKinderA
HaraldLachnitH

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. kinder@mailer.uni-marburg.de

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Category links from this article:

   

Related Memletics topics:

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Related Articles

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Keywords in this article:

abc, ac, according, b, bc+, c+, combinations, conditioning, configural, confirmed, decide, def+, designed, designs, df, different, ef, elemental, elements, except, experimentally, experiments, explanation, eyelid, humans, interspersed, learning, makes, modification, opposite, originally, patterns, pavlovian, pearce, possible, prediction, presented, proportions, proposed, redhead, reinforced, report, response, results, smaller, stimulus, suggest, theories, theory, three, trials, two, whereas

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)

© Advanogy.com 2003-2007 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us