 |
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2001): |
The role of proxies in treatment decisions: evaluating functional capacity to consent to end-of-life treatments within a family context.
Full Abstract
Psychology as a profession has entered the arena of palliative and hospice care later in the process than other health care professions. Through the use of Familial Advance Planning Evaluations (FAPEs), however, psychologists can assist individuals and families in facing end-of-life transitions in important ways. Hospice and palliative care philosophy treats the patient and family as the unit of care. End-of-life decision-making is therefore a family matter as well as a normative developmental transition. Yet, little is known about the decision-making process. This paper reviews the literature regarding informed consent, advance care planning, and proxy decision-making and outlines a theoretical model for familial decision-making. Previous models of end-of-life capacity evaluations and family assessments are presented and serve as the basis for a comprehensive assessment of familial decision-making at the end of life. Functional capacity evaluations of individuals at the end of life regarding decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments enable both the individual patient and one identified proxy from his or her family to discuss important issues families may face during medical crises at the end of life. The information gleaned from such evaluations has the potential to assist psychologists and other professionals in designing family-specific interventions to reduce caregiving distress, improve quality of life for dying patients, and ease the transition to bereavement for caregivers.Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Allen, Rebecca S (RS); Shuster, John L (JL);
Affiliation: Applied Gerontology Program, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0315, USA. raburge(-atsign-)bama.ua.edu
Grants: K01AG00943 (Agency:United States NIA)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Review
Journal: Behavioral sciences & the law (Behav Sci Law), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-; vol 20 (issue 3) : pp 235-52
Dates: Created 2002/07/11; Completed 2002/08/20; Revised 2007/11/14;
PMID: 12111986, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.