|
Research article summary:
The role of orthographic and phonological codes in the word and the pseudoword superiority effect: an analysis by means of multinomial processing tree models.
Abstract Extract:
Central to the current accounts of the word and the pseudoword superiority effect (WSE and PWSE, respectively) is the concept of a unitized code that is less susceptible to masking than single-letter codes. Current explanations of the WSE and PWSE assume ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Dec
in Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform.
2002 Dec;28(6):1409-31
The role of orthographic and phonological codes in the word and the pseudoword superiority effect: an analysis by means of multinomial processing tree models.
Maris E
Nijmegen Institute of Cognition and Information, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. maris@nici.kun.nl
Central to the current accounts of the word and the pseudoword superiority effect (WSE and PWSE, respectively) is the concept of a unitized code that is less susceptible to masking than single-letter codes. Current explanations of the WSE and PWSE assume that this unitized code is orthographic, explaining these phenomena by the assumption of dual read-out from unitized and single-letter codes. In this article, orthographic dual read-out models are compared with a phonological dual read-out model (which is based on the assumption that the 1st unitized code is phonological). From this phonological code, an orthographic code is derived, through either lexical access or assembly. Comparison of the orthographic and phonological dual read-out models was performed by formulating both models as multinomial processing tree models. From an application of these models to the data of 2 letter identification experiments, it was clear that the orthographic dual read-out models are insufficient as an explanation of the PWSE, whereas the phonological dual read-out model is sufficient.
PMID : 12542135 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Eric | Maris | E |
Affiliation: Nijmegen Institute of Cognition and Information, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. maris@nici.kun.nl
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Cognition - physiology
- Humans
- Phonetics
- Photic Stimulation
- Verbal Behavior
- Vocabulary
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:access, accounts, application, article, assembly, assume, assumption, based, central, clear, code, codes, compared, comparison, concept, current, data, derived, dual, effect, experiments, explaining, explanations, formulating, identification, insufficient, less, letter, lexical, masking, models, multinomial, orthographic, out, performed, phenomena, phonological, processing, pseudoword, pwse, read, respectively, single, st, superiority, susceptible, tree, unitized, whereas, word, wse
|
