|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2001): |
Review, deliberation, and voting: a study of selection decisions in a medical school admission committee.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Medical school admission committees differ in their decision-making procedures. Some assign ratings to groups of application materials to devise rank order acceptance lists, whereas others deliberate and vote on each separate application.
PURPOSE:
This study examined what the screening review and deliberative processes contribute to decision making in a medical school admission committee.
METHODS:
We reviewed records of admission committee members' preliminary votes on applicants after initial screening, final votes after committee deliberation, and written comments regarding issues of concern influencing their votes cast. Descriptive univariate and bivariate analyses are presented.
RESULTS:
Approximately one in five votes cast after initial screening was changed following committee deliberation, resulting in majority vote shifts in roughly 10% of cases containing votes by the same committee members at both time periods. Factors cited as influencing vote changes (in declining order of frequency) included Medical College Admission Test scores, medical experience, comparison with other applicants, grades, letters of evaluation, interviews, individual attributes, residency status, service experience, expressed desire of committee members to discuss the applicant at the meeting, American Medical College Application Service personal statement, and diversity.
CONCLUSIONS:
Admission committee members' voting behaviors appear to be influenced by the deliberative process. Future studies should explore the extent to which committee group dynamics influences decision making and the relative contribution of particular academic and nonacademic factors to vote-changing behavior.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Elam, Carol L (CL); Stratton, Terry D (TD); Scott, Kimberly L (KL); Wilson, John F (JF); Lieber, Arthur (A);
Affiliation: Office of Academic Affairs, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, MN 102 Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA. clelam1@pop.uky.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Teaching and learning in medicine (Teach Learn Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-; vol 14 (issue 2) : pp 98-103
Dates: Created 2002/06/12; Completed 2003/02/20; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 12058553, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- The decision-making process of US Food and Drug Administration advisory committees on switches from prescription to over-the-counter status: a comparative case study.
30 Jul 2006 - The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
29 Apr 2007 - Use of the paired-comparison technique to determine the most valued qualities of the McMaster Medical Programme Admissions Process.
30 Dec 2003 - The effect of a rolling admission policy on a medical school's selection of applicants.
29 Jun 1997 - Veterinary school admission interviews, part 3: strategies for increasing interview validity.
30 Dec 2003 - The interview in the admission process.
27 Feb 1990 - How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
30 Mar 2007 - [Discursiveness and co-authority in clinical ethics]
30 Aug 2005 - Financial conflict of interest disclosure and voting patterns at Food and Drug Administration Drug Advisory Committee meetings.
24 Apr 2006 - The need to understand IRB deliberations.
30 Dec 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.