|
Research article summary:
Reliability of health utility measures and a test of values clarification.
Abstract Extract: This study examines the test-retest reliability of two methods of establishing health preference weights and assesses the effectiveness of a brief values-clarification exercise. Survey participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups and ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2003Apr
in Journal: Soc Sci Med
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Soc Sci Med.
2003 Apr;56(7):1531-41
Reliability of health utility measures and a test of values clarification.
Shiell A, Hawe P, Fletcher M
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Alta., T2N 4N1, Calgary, Canada. ashiell@ucalgary.ca
This study examines the test-retest reliability of two methods of establishing health preference weights and assesses the effectiveness of a brief values-clarification exercise. Survey participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups and received either a standard protocol for eliciting health preferences (comparison group) or an augmented protocol designed to encourage reflection and deliberation (intervention group). Preferences were elicited on three occasions over 5 weeks. The results show that the two valuation methods each had acceptable levels of test-retest reliability. No significant differences were found in preference weights over time or between intervention and comparison groups. The values-clarification exercise had some impact on individual answers, but the changes cancelled each other out at the group level. There was no discernable intervention effect at the group level. It is premature to draw conclusions from one study about why, or even how, a person's valuations might change over time, but our results support the use of current valuation techniques for group-level analyses.
PMID : 12614703 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Alan | Shiell | A |
| Penelope | Hawe | P |
| Megan | Fletcher | M |
Affiliation: Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Alta., T2N 4N1, Calgary, Canada. ashiell@ucalgary.ca
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Attitude to Health
- Confidence Intervals
- Consumer Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
- Decision Making
- Family Characteristics
- Female
- Health Status
- Humans
- Male
- New South Wales
- Probability
- Risk Assessment
- Social Values
- Urban Population
- Value of Life - economics
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:acceptable, allocated, answers, assesses, augmented, brief, cancelled, changes, clarification, comparison, conclusions, current, deliberation, designed, differences, discernable, draw, effectiveness, elicited, eliciting, encourage, establishing, even, examines, exercise, groups, health, impact, individual, intervention, levels, methods, occasions, one, or, other, out, over, participants, person, preference, preferences, premature, protocol, randomly, received, reflection, reliability, results, retest, significant, standard, study, support, survey, techniques, test, three, time, two, valuation, valuations, values, weeks, weights, why
|