 |
| Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2003): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
A qualitative study to explore influences on general practitioners' decisions to prescribe new drugs.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Ensuring appropriate prescribing is an important challenge for the health service, and the need for research that takes account of the reasons behind individual general practitioners' (GPs) prescribing decisions has been highlighted.
AIM:
To explore differences among GPs in their decisions to prescribe new drugs.
DESIGN OF STUDY:
Qualitative approach, using in-depth semistructured interviews.
SETTING:
Northern and Yorkshire Health Authority Region.
METHOD:
Participants were identified from a random sample of 520 GPs in a quantitative study of patterns of uptake of eight recently introduced drugs. Purposeful sampling ensured inclusion of GPs prescribing any of the eight drugs and working in a range of practice settings. Fifty-six GPs were interviewed, using a topic guide. Interviews were recorded on audiotape. Transcribed text was methodically coded and data were analysed by constantly comparing emerging themes.
RESULTS:
Both low and high prescribers shared a view of themselves as conservative in their prescribing behaviour. Low prescribers appeared to conform more strongly to group norms and identified a consensus among practice partners in prescribing and cost-consciousness. Conformism to group norms was represented by a commitment to practice formularies. High prescribers more often expressed themselves to be indifferent to drug costs and a shared practice ethos.
CONCLUSIONS:
A shift in the attitudes of some GPs is required before cost-effectiveness is routinely incorporated in drug prescribing. The promotion of rational prescribing is likely to be more successful if efforts are focused on GPs' appreciation of cost issues and attitudes towards shared decision-making and responsibility.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Jacoby, Ann (A); Smith, Monica (M); Eccles, Martin (M);
Affiliation: Department of Primary Care, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB. ajacoby(-atsign-)liv.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners (Br J Gen Pract), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Feb; vol 53 (issue 487) : pp 120-5
Dates: Created 2003/06/23; Completed 2003/07/23; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12817357, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.