 |
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2002): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Qualitative research methods are recognized increasingly as valuable tools for primary care research, and add an extra dimension to quantitative work.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to illustrate the benefits and problems attending the dual role of clinician/qualitative researcher.
METHODS:
As part of two studies employing semi-structured interviews of GPs in a North-West conurbation, about the topics of consultations on chronic low back pain and drug misuse in primary care, respondents' views on their interaction with a GP researcher were explored.
RESULTS:
Access to the GP by the interviewing GP was easier when the GP researcher was known to the respondent. Such prior knowledge, however, may then influence the content of the data and the manner in which the GP researcher is perceived. During the interview itself, where respondents recognized the researcher as a clinician, interviews were broader in scope and provided richer and more personal accounts of attitudes and behaviour in clinical practice. The GP was also identified as an expert and judge, not just of clinical decision making but also about moral judgements made by GPs in their work. This will impact on the data obtained at interview and must be taken into consideration when the data are interpreted and analysed.
CONCLUSION:
Qualitative research techniques increasingly are advocated as appropriate for research on and in general practice. The professional identity of the researcher plays an important part in constructing the kind of data obtained in such studies, and this must be made apparent in reporting and discussions of such qualitative work.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Chew-Graham, Carolyn A (CA); May, Carl R (CR); Perry, Mark S (MS);
Affiliation: School of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Rusholme Health Centre, Walmer Street, Manchester M14 5NP, UK.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Family practice (Fam Pract), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Jun; vol 19 (issue 3) : pp 285-9
Dates: Created 2002/04/29; Completed 2002/07/12; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 11978720, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.