Picture interpretation and Jungian typology.

Full Abstract

This study examined a Jungian picture interpretation schema, which utilizes a specific quadrant method. This proposed schema, which is used in training at the C. G. Jung Institute in Zürich, attaches significance to specific areas of a drawing. The upper left of a drawing is associated with the father; the lower left with the unconscious; the lower right with the mother; and the upper right with the future. Three questions served as the foci of this study:
Is the schema valid? Do certain types within Jung's personality theory respond better than others to the schema? Does the schema work best when it elicits a strong affective response from the person who created the picture? Subjects took one of two tests:
a space domain test, or a colour associative test. The results revealed only two significant effects:
a positive association (in the space domain test) between unconscious material with the unconscious quadrant and a negative association (in the colour associative test) of mother material with the mother quadrant. These results suggest that the Jungian quadrant schema used to interpret drawings is invalid and of minimal practical utility. Other methods of picture interpretation are discussed as well as suggestions for future research that would be helpful to this field.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Bergeron, Derek P (DP); Rosen, David H (DH); Arnau, Randolph C (RC); Mascaro, Nathan (N);

Affiliation: prufroc8(-atsign-)hotmail.com

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: The Journal of analytical psychology (J Anal Psychol), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2003-Feb; vol 48 (issue 1) : pp 83-99

Dates: Created 2003/03/31; Completed 2003/06/11; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12664716, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: J Anal Psychol. 2004 Jun;49(3):447-53. (PMID: 15149451)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

Collective complexes--total perspectives. 30 Oct 2006
Ethics and the sexual countertransference. 30 Jan 2007
Primordial image and the archetypal design of art. 29 Jun 1991
Jung's and Freud's contributions to dream interpretation: a comparison. 30 Mar 1976
The relevance of attachment theory to a contemporary Jungian view of the internal world: internal working models, implicit memory and internal objects. 29 Sep 1999
Why it is difficult to see the anima as a helpful object: critique and clinical relevance of the theory of archetypes. 29 Sep 2000
"Collective figures" and the representational world. 30 Dec 1982
Internal objects--a theoretical analysis of Jungian and Kleinian models. 29 Sep 1997
Archetype theory, evolutionary psychology and the Baldwin effect. A commentary on Hogenson's paper (October 2001, JAP, 46, 4). 30 Jan 2003
Type T personality and the Jungian classification system. 30 Dec 1989

See 100+ related articles.