|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2003): |
Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty.
Full Abstract
We show that likelihood judgments are biased toward an ignorance-prior probability that assigns equal credence to each mutually exclusive event considered by the judge. The value of the ignorance prior depends crucially on how the set of possibilities (i.e., the state space) is subjectively partitioned by the judge. For instance, asking "what is the probability that Sunday will be hotter than any other day next week?" facilitates a two-fold case partition, [Sunday hotter, Sunday not hotter], thus priming an ignorance prior of 1/2. In contrast, asking "what is the probability that the hottest day of the week will be Sunday?" facilitates a seven-fold class partition, [Sunday hottest, Monday hottest, etc.], priming an ignorance prior of 1/7. In four studies, we observed systematic partition dependence:
Judgments made by participants presented with either case or class formulations of the same query were biased toward the corresponding ignorance prior.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Fox, Craig R (CR); Rottenstreich, Yuval (Y);
Affiliation: Anderson School of Management, University of California at Los Angeles, 90095-1481, USA. craig.fox(-atsign-)anderson.ucla.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: Psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society / APS (Psychol Sci), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-May; vol 14 (issue 3) : pp 195-200
Dates: Created 2003/05/13; Completed 2003/08/05; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12741740, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
30 May 2008 - On some limits of hypothetical thinking.
28 Jul 2007 - The "ripple effect": cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events.
29 Apr 2006 - The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
29 Jun 2005 - Hasty decision-making in a variety of tasks: does it contribute to the development of delusions?
16 Apr 2008 - Coherent probability from incoherent judgment.
27 Feb 2001 - Reasoning and delusion proneness: confidence in decisions.
30 Dec 2007 - Why is p = .90 better than p = .70? Preference for definitive predictions by lay consumers of probability judgements.
30 May 2001 - Failure to construct and transfer correct representations across probability problems.
30 Jan 2004 - Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
27 Feb 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.