|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2002): |
No within-object advantage for detection of rotation.
Full Abstract
It is known that in a detection task the type of rigid transformation to be detected (reflection vs. translation) interacts with the type of display (closed vs. open contours). The advantage for closed contours found with reflection is believed to be a general within-object advantage, whilst the advantage for open contours found with translation is an exception, described as a lock-and-key process (Acta Psychol. 95 (1997) 119). We tested rotation, using a reaction time paradigm, and found the same result as for translation. Moreover, we found that the critical factor is not the number of objects present, rather it is whether the comparison is made across a surface or across an aperture between surfaces. Post-experiment interviews did not confirm any difference for observers who reported using a conscious lock-and-key mental transformation. We speculate that seeing a translation or a rotation across a closed figure is difficult because the closure of the figure emphasises the mismatch of the contour polarities on the two sides of the figure. That is, there may be a closed object advantage for detecting a difference in polarity which interferes with the task of detecting a regularity in shape. Evidence from the analysis of foil rejection trials supports such a speculation.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Bertamini, Marco (M); Friedenberg, Jay (J); Argyle, Laurence (L);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool. m.bertamini(-atsign-)liverpool.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Acta psychologica (Acta Psychol (Amst)), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Jul; vol 111 (issue 1) : pp 59-81
Dates: Created 2002/07/09; Completed 2002/10/10; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 12102121, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Mechanisms of the associated nontargets effect: processes influenced by statistical learning in a simple visual environment.
30 May 2007 - The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
29 Sep 2007 - Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection.
21 Dec 2007 - Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
21 May 2008 - Electrophysiological evidence for independent consolidation of multiple targets.
6 Oct 2008 - Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
6 Oct 2008 - Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
May 2007 - Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.
29 Jun 2007 - Global perception depends on coherent work of bilateral visual cortices: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies.
30 Jul 2007 - Masked onset priming effect for high-frequency words: further support for the speech-planning account.
30 Jul 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.