Research article summary:

Narrative plausibility: the impact of sequence and anchoring.

Abstract Extract:
The perceived plausibility of suspect narratives is hypothesized to be a product of more than logical evaluation. Aspects of the narratives internal structure, notably the extent to which it follows a canonical (or stereotypical) sequence of events, may ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003 in Journal: Behav Sci Law (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Behav Sci Law. 2003 ;21(2):251-67

Narrative plausibility: the impact of sequence and anchoring.

Canter DV, Grieve N, Nicol C, Benneworth K

Centre for Investigative Psychology, Department of Psychology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. carter@liv.ac.uk

The perceived plausibility of suspect narratives is hypothesized to be a product of more than logical evaluation. Aspects of the narrative's internal structure, notably the extent to which it follows a canonical (or stereotypical) sequence of events, may influence judged plausibility. Plausibility may also be sensitive to external "anchors" that activate relevant schema. To test these possibilities, variations of two suspect testimonies were created in accordance with the model by Stein and Glenn (1979) of a stereotypical story grammar, and the account by Wagenaar, van Koppen, and Crombag (1993) of narrative anchoring. Subjects rated the narrative account using a perceived plausibility scale developed from pilot work. ANOVA revealed that criminal anchoring in suspect statements, regardless of the crime scenario, has a negative effect on the plausibility level. Similarly, plausibility levels were lower when the statement did not follow a temporal sequence of events. The implications for models of how people judge plausibility are discussed, as are the practical implications for legal contexts.

PMID : 12645048 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]

This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First Name	LastName	Initials
David V	Canter	DV
Nicola	Grieve	N
Catherine	Nicol	C
Kelly	Benneworth	K

Affiliation: Centre for Investigative Psychology, Department of Psychology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. carter@liv.ac.uk

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

>>> Get more research article abstracts like these, or browse abstracts.

Keywords in this article:

accordance, account, activate, anchoring, anchors, anova, aspects, canonical, created, crime, criminal, crombag, developed, discussed, effect, evaluation, events, extent, external, follows, glenn, grammar, hypothesized, implications, influence, internal, judged, koppen, legal, level, levels, logical, lower, model, models, more, narratives, negative, notably, people, perceived, pilot, plausibility, possibilities, practical, product, rated, regardless, relevant, revealed, scale, scenario, schema, sensitive, sequence, similarly, statements, stein, stereotypical, story, structure, subjects, suspect, temporal, test, testimonies, two, variations, wagenaar, work

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)