|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2002): |
The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
Full Abstract
Modern memory researchers rely heavily on the encoding-retrieval match, defined as the similarity between coded retrieval cues and previously encoded engrams, to explain variability in retention. The encoding-retrieval match is assumed to be causally and monotonically related to retention, although other factors (such as cue overload) presumably operate in some circumstances. I argue here that the link between the encoding-retrieval match and retention, although generally positive, is essentially correlational rather than causal--much like the link between deep/elaborative processing and retention. Empirically, increasing the functional match between a cue and a target trace can improve, have no effect, or even decrease retention performance depending on the circumstance. We cannot make unequivocal predictions about retention by appealing to the encoding-retrieval match; instead, we should be focusing our attention on the extent to which retrieval cues provide diagnostic information about target occurrence.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Nairne, James S (JS);
Affiliation: Department of Psychological Services, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1364, USA. nairne(-atsign-)psych.purdue.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal: Memory (Hove, England) (Memory), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: -2002 Sep-Nov; vol 10 (issue 5-6) : pp 389-95
Dates: Created 2002/10/24; Completed 2002/12/27; Revised 2005/11/16;
PMID: 12396651, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Working memory load in the initial learning phase facilitates relearning: a study of vocabulary learning.
30 Jan 2008 - Situation models and memory: the effects of temporal and causal information on recall sequence.
29 Sep 2007 - Directed forgetting in the list method affects recognition memory for source.
30 Oct 2007 - Using cue words to investigate the distribution of autobiographical memories in childhood.
29 Sep 2007 - The role of protein synthesis during the labile phases of memory: revisiting the skepticism.
22 Oct 2007 - The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.
30 Mar 2008 - Hippocampal activation during episodic and semantic memory retrieval: comparing category production and category cued recall.
16 Mar 2008 - Is the posterior parietal lobe involved in working memory retrieval? Evidence from patients with bilateral parietal lobe damage.
20 Mar 2008 - Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies.
29 Apr 2008 - Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.
6 Apr 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.