|
|
| Research article summary (published 27 Feb 2003): |
Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The type of academic goals pursued by students is one of the most important variables in motivational research in educational contexts. Although motivational theory and research have emphasised the somewhat exclusive nature of two types of goal orientation (learning goals versus performance goals), some studies (Meece, 1994; Seifert, 1995, 1996) have shown that the two kinds of goals are relatively complementary and that it is possible for students to have multiple goals simultaneously, which guarantees some flexibility to adapt more efficaciously to various contexts and learning situations.
AIM:
The principal aim of this study is to determine the academic goals pursued by university students and to analyse the differences in several very significant variables related to motivation and academic learning.
SAMPLE:
Participants were 609 university students (74% women and 26% men) who filled in several questionnaires about the variables under study.
METHOD:
We used cluster analysis ('quick cluster analysis' method) to establish the different groups or clusters of individuals as a function of the three types of goals (learning goals, performance goals, and social reinforcement goals). By means of MANOVA, we determined whether the groups or clusters identified were significantly different in the variables that are relevant to motivation and academic learning. Lastly, we performed ANOVA on the variables that revealed significant effects in the previous analysis.
RESULTS:
Using cluster analysis, three groups of students with different motivational orientations were identified:
a group with predominance of performance goals (Group
PG:
n = 230), a group with predominance of multiple goals (Group
MG:
n = 238), and a group with predominance of learning goals (Group
LG:
n = 141).
CONCLUSIONS:
Groups MG and LG attributed their success more to ability, they had higher perceived ability, they took task characteristics into account when planning which strategies to use in the learning process, they showed higher persistence, and used more deep learning strategies than did the students with predominance of performance goals (Group PG). On the other hand, Groups MG and PG took the evaluation criteria more into account when deciding which strategies to use in order to learn, and they attributed their failures more to luck than did Group LG. Students from Group MG attributed their success more to effort than did the other two groups and they attained higher achievement than Group PG. Group LG tended to attribute their failures more to lack of effort than did the other two groups.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Valle, Antonio (A); Cabanach, Ramón G (RG); Núnez, José C (JC); González-Pienda, Julio (J); Rodríguez, Susana (S); Piñeiro, Isabel (I);
Affiliation: Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of La Coruna, Spain. vallar(-atsign-)udc.es
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: The British journal of educational psychology (Br J Educ Psychol), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Mar; vol 73 (issue Pt 1) : pp 71-87
Dates: Created 2003/03/17; Completed 2003/05/23; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 12639278, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Multiple-goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies.
29 Nov 2001 - Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools.
29 Nov 2006 - Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement.
30 Dec 2005 - The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities.
29 Apr 2003 - Developmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teachers' goals during the transition to primary school.
27 Feb 2006 - Smoothing out transitions: how pedagogy influences medical students' achievement of self-regulated learning goals.
8 Jun 2006 - Changes in high-school students' competence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathematics.
28 Feb 2008 - Goal orientation and its relationship to academic success in a laptop-based BScN program.
24 Aug 2005 - Motivational analysis of academic help-seeking: self-determination in adolescents' friendship.
30 May 2007 - Academic self-handicapping: the role of self-concept clarity and students' learning strategies.
27 Feb 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.