Accelerated-Learning-Online.com - helping you learn faster
Home | Contact Us
Search Site:
 
Home
Learning State
Learning Process
Memory Techniques
Learning Styles
Learning Approach
Learning Challenges
Other Resources
Research Articles
Brain News
Contact Us

Research article summary:

A method for measuring quality of life through subjective weighting of functional status.

Abstract Extract:
OBJECTIVE: To apply a new tool to understand the quality of life (QOL) implications of patients functional status. DESIGN: Results from the Features-Resource Trade-Off Game were used to form utility weights by ranking functional activities by the ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003Apr in Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Apr;84(4 Suppl 2):S15-22

A method for measuring quality of life through subjective weighting of functional status.

Stineman MG, Wechsler B, Ross R, Maislin G

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2676, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To apply a new tool to understand the quality of life (QOL) implications of patients' functional status. DESIGN: Results from the Features-Resource Trade-Off Game were used to form utility weights by ranking functional activities by the relative value of achieving independence in each activity compared with all other component activities. The utility weights were combined with patients' actual levels of performance across the same activities to produce QOL-weighted functional status scores and to form "value rulers" to order activities by perceived importance. SETTING: Persons with severe disabilities living in the community and clinicians practicing in various rehabilitation disciplines. PARTICIPANTS: Two panels of 5 consumers with disabilities and 2 panels of 5 rehabilitation clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: The 4 panels played the Features Resource Trade-Off Game by using the FIMT(TM) instrument definitions. Main Outcome Measures: Utility weights for each of the 18 FIM items, QOL-weighted FIM scores, and value rulers. RESULTS: All 4 panels valued the achievement of independence in cognitive and communication activities more than independence in physical activities. Consequently, the unweighted FIM scores of patients who have severe physical disabilities but relatively intact cognitive skills will underestimate QOL, while inflating QOL in those with low levels of independence in cognition and communication but higher physical function. CONCLUSION: Independence in some activities is more valued than in others; thus, 2 people with the same numeric functional status score could experience very different QOL. QOL-weighted functional status scores translate objectively measured functional status into its subjective meaning. This new technology for measuring subjective function-related QOL has a variety of applications to clinical, educational, and research practices.

PMID : 12692767 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]


This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First NameLastNameInitials
Margaret GStinemanMG
BarbaraWechslerB
RichardRossR
GregMaislinG

Affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2676, USA.

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Category links from this article:

  • Activities of Daily Living - classification
  • Attitude to Health
  • Bias (Epidemiology)
  • Choice Behavior
  • Cognition
  • Communication
  • Cost of Illness
  • Disabled Persons - psychology, rehabilitation
  • Game Theory
  • Humans
  • Karnofsky Performance Status
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life
  • Questionnaires
  • Recovery of Function
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Treatment Outcome
   

Related Memletics topics:

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Related Articles

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Keywords in this article:

achievement, achieving, across, activities, activity, actual, applications, apply, clinical, clinicians, cognition, cognitive, combined, communication, community, compared, component, conclusion, consequently, consumers, definitions, design, different, disabilities, disciplines, educational, experience, features, fimt, form, functional, game, higher, implications, importance, independence, inflating, instrument, intact, interventions, items, levels, life, living, low, main, meaning, measured, measures, measuring, more, new, numeric, objective, objectively, off, order, other, others, outcome, panels, participants, patients, people, perceived, performance, persons, physical, played, practicing, produce, qol, quality, ranking, rehabilitation, related, relative, relatively, research, resource, results, rulers, same, scores, setting, severe, skills, status, subjective, technology, tm, tool, trade, translate, two, underestimate, understand, unweighted, utility, value, valued, variety, weighted, weights, who, will

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)

© Advanogy.com 2003-2007 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us