Accelerated-Learning-Online.com - helping you learn faster
Home | Contact Us
Search Site:
 
Home
Learning State
Learning Process
Memory Techniques
Learning Styles
Learning Approach
Learning Challenges
Other Resources
Research Articles
Brain News
Contact Us

Research article summary:

Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

Abstract Extract:
The study of deductive reasoning has been a major paradigm in psychology for approximately the past 40 years. Research has shown that people make many logical errors on such tasks and are strongly influenced by problem content and context. It is argued ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2002Nov in Journal: Psychol Bull (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Psychol Bull. 2002 Nov;128(6):978-96

Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

Evans JS

Centre for Thinking and Language, Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, England. jevans@plym.ac.uk

The study of deductive reasoning has been a major paradigm in psychology for approximately the past 40 years. Research has shown that people make many logical errors on such tasks and are strongly influenced by problem content and context. It is argued that this paradigm was developed in a context of logicist thinking that is now outmoded. Few reasoning researchers still believe that logic is an appropriate normative system for most human reasoning, let alone a model for describing the process of human reasoning, and many use the paradigm principally to study pragmatic and probabilistic processes. It is suggested that the methods used for studying reasoning be reviewed, especially the instructional context, which necessarily defines pragmatic influences as biases.

PMID : 12405140 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]


This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First NameLastNameInitials
Jonathan St B TEvansJS

Affiliation: Centre for Thinking and Language, Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, England. jevans@plym.ac.uk

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Category links from this article:

   

Related Memletics topics:

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Related Articles

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Keywords in this article:

alone, appropriate, approximately, argued, believe, content, context, deductive, defines, describing, developed, errors, few, human, influenced, influences, instructional, let, logical, logicist, major, many, methods, model, necessarily, normative, now, outmoded, paradigm, past, people, pragmatic, principally, probabilistic, problem, process, processes, psychology, reasoning, research, researchers, reviewed, still, strongly, study, studying, suggested, system, tasks, thinking, years

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)

© Advanogy.com 2003-2007 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us