|
Research article summary:
Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.
Abstract Extract: Picture-word interference studies typically show that semantically related distractor words embedded within a picture slow picture-naming responses, relative to unrelated ones. This semantic interference effect is commonly interpreted as arising from the ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2003Mar
in Journal: Psychon Bull Rev
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Psychon Bull Rev.
2003 Mar;10(1):111-7
Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.
Damian MF, Bowers JS
University of Bristol, Department of Experimental Psychology, Bristol, England. m.damian@bristol.ac.uk
Picture-word interference studies typically show that semantically related distractor words embedded within a picture slow picture-naming responses, relative to unrelated ones. This semantic interference effect is commonly interpreted as arising from the competition of lexical-semantic (e.g., Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990) or lexical-phonological (e.g., Starreveld & La Heij, 1996) codes. The experiment reported here tests a crucial assumption shared by these accounts--namely, that the effect reflects a lexical, rather than a nonverbal, conceptual conflict. Pictures were named while participants attempted to ignore embedded distractors that were in either verbal or pictorial format. The presence of both words and pictures substantially interfered with naming responses, but only words, not pictures, were found to induce semantic interference. These findings support the claim that for semantic interference to arise, both target picture and distractor have to be lexicalized. Consequently, a general conceptual locus of the effect can be excluded, and the claim that semantic interference is based on a lexical conflict is confirmed.
PMID : 12747497 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Markus F | Damian | MF |
| Jeffrey S | Bowers | JS |
Affiliation: University of Bristol, Department of Experimental Psychology, Bristol, England. m.damian@bristol.ac.uk
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article: | | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:accounts, arise, arising, assumption, attempted, based, claim, codes, commonly, competition, conceptual, conflict, consequently, crucial, distractor, distractors, effect, embedded, excluded, experiment, findings, format, general, heij, ignore, induce, interfered, interference, interpreted, levelt, lexical, lexicalized, locus, meyer, named, namely, naming, nonverbal, not, ones, participants, phonological, pictorial, picture, pictures, presence, reflects, related, relative, reported, responses, schriefers, semantically, shared, slow, starreveld, studies, substantially, support, target, tests, typically, unrelated, word, words
|