|
Research article summary:
Leveling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals.
Abstract Extract:
There has been a recent growth in claims that qualitative research proposals are not treated equitably by ethics committees. In response, recent arguments centered on establishing the ethics of qualitative research, in the eyes of ethics committees, have ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Sep
in Journal: Qual Health Res
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Qual Health Res.
2002 Sep;12(7):1000-10
Leveling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals.
Cutcliffe JR, Ramcharan P
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
There has been a recent growth in claims that qualitative research proposals are not treated equitably by ethics committees. In response, recent arguments centered on establishing the ethics of qualitative research, in the eyes of ethics committees, have indicated the need for an "ethics-as-process" approach. Accordingly, in this article, the authors illustrate the merits of this approach and provide three examples from the field: the outcomes of participating in qualitative interviews, sensitive handling of ending in qualitative research relationships, and the ongoing establishment of informed consent. The authors hope to increase awareness of the potential benefits of this approach and contribute to the ensuing debate.
PMID : 12214674 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| John R | Cutcliffe | JR |
| Paul | Ramcharan | P |
Affiliation: Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Decision Making, Organizational
- Ethics Committees, Research - organization & administration
- Ethics, Research
- Human Experimentation - ethics
- Humans
- Informed Consent - ethics
- Judgment
- Patient Advocacy - ethics
- Qualitative Research
- Research Subjects
- Researcher-Subject Relations - ethics
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:accordingly, approach, arguments, article, authors, awareness, benefits, centered, claims, committees, consent, contribute, ending, ensuing, equitably, establishing, establishment, ethics, examples, eyes, field, growth, handling, hope, illustrate, increase, indicated, informed, interviews, merits, need, not, ongoing, outcomes, participating, potential, process, proposals, provide, qualitative, recent, relationships, research, response, sensitive, three, treated
|
