 |
| Research article summary (published 27 Feb 2002): |
Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerised instruction.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the relationship between learning preferences, attitudes towards computers, and student evaluation of a computer-assisted instructional (CAI) program.
CONTEXT:
A third year required clerkship in surgery at the University of Nebraska Medical Center.
METHODS:
A mixed-methods design combining attitudinal measures and qualitative interviews was employed to assess student reactions to a CAI program on angiography completed during a required surgical clerkship. Between January 1998 and July 1999, 151 students completed the program. Prior to participating, students completed the Rezler Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitudes survey (CAS). The LPI characterizes learning preferences as being abstract or concrete, individual or interpersonal, and student-structured or teacher-structured. The CAS measures attitudes towards computers and their role in education. After using the CAI program, students evaluated the module by completing an 18 item questionnaire. Based on LPI and CAS scores, 31 students were invited to participate in an in-depth qualitative interview on their experiences and perceptions of the program.
RESULTS:
There was no relationship between learning preferences, computer attitudes, and evaluation of the CAI program. Students were very positive about the program's content, clarity, organization, and ease of use. They also rated it as efficient and effective. However, many still indicated a preference for lecture and text-based learning. Qualitative interviews suggest students worry computers will supplant student--teacher contact.
CONCLUSIONS:
Learning preferences and prior attitudes toward computers did not bias student reactions to the CAI program assessed in this study. However, students expressed concerns that CAI would interfere with the traditional student--teacher encounter and relationship.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Steele, David J (DJ); Johnson Palensky, Jodi E (JE); Lynch, Thomas G (TG); Lacy, Naomi L (NL); Duffy, Sean W (SW);
Affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. david.steele(-atsign-)med.fsu.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Medical education (Med Educ), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Mar; vol 36 (issue 3) : pp 225-32
Dates: Created 2002/03/06; Completed 2002/04/23; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 11879512, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: Med Educ. 2002 Mar;36(3):214-5. (PMID: 11879510)
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.