Interpretations of child compliance in individuals at high- and low-risk for child physical abuse.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
Our studies compared individuals at high- and low-risk for child physical abuse on measures of social information processing.

METHOD:
Two studies were conducted using similar methods. Twenty-eight childless women in Study 1 and 36 mothers in Study 2 read vignettes of parent-child interactions in which the child's level of compliance was difficult to interpret. Participants were asked a series of questions about the child's behavior and their own reactions.

RESULTS:
Accuracy and bias in identifying compliant behavior were assessed using a signal detection paradigm. In both samples, high- and low-risk participants did not differ in their overall accuracy in identifying children's behaviors. However, they used different evaluation standards such that high-risk participants were biased toward seeing more noncompliance and low-risk participants were biased toward seeing more compliance. High- and low-risk participants also made different types of errors in interpreting children's behavior. Low-risk participants were more likely to misinterpret noncompliant behavior as compliant, and there was a trend for high-risk participants to not perceive compliant behavior when it occurred. There were no differences in reported disciplinary responses in either study and the results for affective reactions were mixed.

CONCLUSIONS:
Specific differences in social information processing between high- and low-risk individuals replicated across samples, suggesting a reliable association between evaluation standards and risk of child physical abuse. However, the absence of differences in reported discipline and inconsistent findings on affective reactions indicate the need to identify the mechanism through which cognition influences parenting behavior.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Dopke, Cynthia A (CA); Lundahl, Brad W (BW); Dunsterville, Emma (E); Lovejoy, M Christine (MC);

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Medical School, 259 E. Erie St., Suite 251, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: Child abuse & neglect (Child Abuse Negl), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2003-Mar; vol 27 (issue 3) : pp 285-302

Dates: Created 2003/03/25; Completed 2003/06/20; Revised 2006/11/15;

PMID: 12654326, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Adolescent
Adult
Affect
Child Abuse - psychology; statistics & numerical data
Child Behavior - classification; psychology
Child, Preschool
Data Collection
Female

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.