Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 12 May 2003):
Free Full Text!
See links below

Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Full Abstract

CONTEXT:
The Internet has attracted considerable attention as a means to improve health and health care delivery, but it is not clear how prevalent Internet use for health care really is or what impact it has on health care utilization. Available estimates of use and impact vary widely. Without accurate estimates of use and effects, it is difficult to focus policy discussions or design appropriate policy activities.

OBJECTIVES:
To measure the extent of Internet use for health care among a representative sample of the US population, to examine the prevalence of e-mail use for health care, and to examine the effects that Internet and e-mail use has on users' knowledge about health care matters and their use of the health care system. DESIGN, SETTING,

AND PARTICIPANTS:
Survey conducted in December 2001 and January 2002 among a sample drawn from a research panel of more than 60 000 US households developed and maintained by Knowledge Networks. Responses were analyzed from 4764 individuals aged 21 years or older who were self-reported Internet users.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Self-reported rates in the past year of Internet and e-mail use to obtain information related to health, contact health care professionals, and obtain prescriptions; perceived effects of Internet and e-mail use on health care use.

RESULTS:
Approximately 40% of respondents with Internet access reported using the Internet to look for advice or information about health or health care in 2001. Six percent reported using e-mail to contact a physician or other health care professional. About one third of those using the Internet for health reported that using the Internet affected a decision about health or their health care, but very few reported impacts on measurable health care utilization; 94% said that Internet use had no effect on the number of physician visits they had and 93% said it had no effect on the number of telephone contacts. Five percent or less reported use of the Internet to obtain prescriptions or purchase pharmaceutical products.

CONCLUSIONS:
Although many people use the Internet for health information, use is not as common as is sometimes reported. Effects on actual health care utilization are also less substantial than some have claimed. Discussions of the role of the Internet in health care and the development of policies that might influence this role should not presume that use of the Internet for health information is universal or that the Internet strongly influences health care utilization.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Baker, Laurence (L); Wagner, Todd H (TH); Singer, Sara (S); Bundorf, M Kate (MK);

Affiliation: Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif 94305-5405, USA. laurence.baker(-atsign-)stanford.edu

Grants: AG17253 (Agency:United States NIA)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Journal: JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2003-May; vol 289 (issue 18) : pp 2400-6

Dates: Created 2003/05/14; Completed 2003/05/23; Revised 2007/11/14;

PMID: 12746364, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2255; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600178)

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2255; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600177)

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2256-7; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600180)

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2256; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600181)

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2256; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600179)

CommentIn: JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2257; author reply 2257-8. (PMID: 14600182)

ErratumIn: JAMA. 2003 July 16;290(3):334.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

3/30/2004
7/10/2007
Higher Relevance Score (533/1000)
Lower Relevance Score (433/1000)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index