Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 29 Sep 2003):

What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months.

Full Abstract

Generative linguistic theory stands on the hypothesis that grammar cannot be acquired solely on the basis of an analysis of the input, but depends, in addition, on innate structure within the learner to guide the process of acquisition. This hypothesis derives from a logical argument, however, and its consequences have never been examined experimentally with infant learners. Challenges to this hypothesis, claiming that an analysis of the input is indeed sufficient to explain grammatical acquisition, have recently gained attention. We demonstrate with novel experimentation the insufficiency of this countervailing view. Focusing on the syntactic structures required to determine the antecedent for the pronoun one, we demonstrate that the input to children does not contain sufficient information to support unaided learning. Nonetheless, we show that 18-month-old infants do have command of the syntax of one. Because this syntactic knowledge could not have been gleaned exclusively from the input, infants' mastery of this aspect of syntax constitutes evidence for the contribution of innate structure within the learner in acquiring a grammar.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Lidz, Jeffrey (J); Waxman, Sandra (S); Freedman, Jennifer (J);

Affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, 2016 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. jlidz(-atsign-)northwestern.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Cognition (Cognition), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2003-Oct; vol 89 (issue 3) : pp B65-73

Dates: Created 2003/09/09; Completed 2003/10/21; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12963265, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Cognition. 2004 Sep;93(2):139-40; discussion 157-65. (PMID: 15147934)

CommentIn: Cognition. 2004 Sep;93(2):141-5; discussion 157-65. (PMID: 15147935)

CommentIn: Cognition. 2004 Sep;93(2):147-55; discussion 157-65. (PMID: 15147936)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index