Accelerated-Learning-Online.com - helping you learn faster
Home | Contact Us
Search Site:
 
Home
Learning State
Learning Process
Memory Techniques
Learning Styles
Learning Approach
Learning Challenges
Other Resources
Research Articles
Brain News
Contact Us

Research article summary:

Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.

Abstract Extract:
The effect of various relationships between a response (an investment made in the context of a game) and an outcome (a return on the investment) on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response was examined. In Experiment 1, response rates and ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003May in Journal: Learn Behav (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. Learn Behav. 2003 May;31(2):205-11

Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.

Reed P

Department of Psychology, University College London, London, England. p.reed@ucl.ac.uk

The effect of various relationships between a response (an investment made in the context of a game) and an outcome (a return on the investment) on judgments of the causal effectiveness of the response was examined. In Experiment 1, response rates and causal judgments were higher for a differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate (DRH) schedule relative to a variable-ratio (VR) schedule with the same probability of outcome following a response. Response rates were also higher for a DRH than for a variable-interval schedule matched for reinforcement rate. In Experiment 2, response rates and causal judgments were lower for a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule relative to a VR schedule with the same probability of outcome following a response. These results corroborate the view that schedules are a determinant of both response rates and causal judgments, and that few current theories of causal judgment explicitly predict this pattern of results.

PMID : 12882379 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]


This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First NameLastNameInitials
PhilReedP

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University College London, London, England. p.reed@ucl.ac.uk

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Category links from this article:

   

Related Memletics topics:

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Related Articles

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Keywords in this article:

causal, context, corroborate, current, determinant, differential, drh, effect, effectiveness, examined, experiment, explicitly, few, following, game, higher, interval, investment, judgments, lower, matched, outcome, pattern, predict, probability, rates, ratio, reinforcement, relationships, relative, response, results, return, same, schedule, schedules, theories, variable, view, vr

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)

© Advanogy.com 2003-2007 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us