General and relationship-specific models of social cognition: explaining the overlap and discrepancies.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
This study examined the degree of overlap and sources of discrepancies between two alternative models of social cognition in early adolescence, a general model based on 'theory of mind' and a relationship-specific model rooted in attachment theory.

METHODS:
We administered newly developed, age-appropriate measures of advanced theory of mind or 'mentalising' and child-parent attachment, indexed by the coherence of children's narratives about attachment relationships, to a sample of 70 early adolescents (mean age 12.6 years).

RESULTS:
The central findings were that, as expected, there was significant overlap between the mentalising and attachment indices of social cognition (r(70) = .35, p < .01). The overlap was not significantly mediated by verbal ability or general measures of parenting. There were also substantial discrepancies in children's performance on these measures that were conceptually interesting and statistically reliable. Specifically, adolescent reports of parenting discriminated between measures of mentalising and attachment coherence. In addition, those children who exhibited a less coherent model of attachment than was predicted from performance on a mentalising task were more likely to be rated as exhibiting a 'Dismissing/Avoidant' style in the attachment interview.

CONCLUSIONS:
Findings support a connection between mentalising and attachment in early adolescence, and further suggest that social cognitive processes may be context and relationship-specific.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Humfress, Harriet (H); O'Connor, Thomas G (TG); Slaughter, Jeremy (J); Target, Mary (M); Fonagy, Peter (P);

Affiliation: University College London, UK.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines (J Child Psychol Psychiatry), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-Oct; vol 43 (issue 7) : pp 873-83

Dates: Created 2002/10/30; Completed 2003/03/06; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12405476, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.