|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Nov 2002): |
False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: the role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness.
Full Abstract
Recently, a number of experiments have emphasized the degree to which subjects fail to detect large changes in visual scenes. This finding, referred to as "change blindness," is often considered surprising because many people have the intuition that such changes should be easy to detect. documented this intuition by showing that the majority of subjects believe they would notice changes that are actually very rarely detected. Thus subjects exhibit a metacognitive error we refer to as "change blindness blindness." Here, we test whether CBB is caused by a misestimation of the perceptual experience associated with visual changes and show that it persists even when the pre- and postchange views are separated by long delays. In addition, subjects overestimate their change detection ability both when the relevant changes are illustrated by still pictures, and when they are illustrated using videos showing the changes occurring in real time. We conclude that CBB is a robust phenomenon that cannot be accounted for by failure to understand the specific perceptual experience associated with a change.Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Levin, Daniel T (DT); Drivdahl, Sarah B (SB); Momen, Nausheen (N); Beck, Melissa R (MR);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Kent State University, PO Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA. dlevin(-atsign-)kent.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Consciousness and cognition (Conscious Cogn), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Dec; vol 11 (issue 4) : pp 507-27
Dates: Created 2002/12/09; Completed 2003/04/08; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 12470620, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.