|
Research article summary:
Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination.
Abstract Extract: OBJECTIVE: This study updates work published in 1998, which found that of 47 rating instruments appearing on websites offering health information, 14 described how they were developed, five provided instructions for use, and none reported the ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Mar
in Journal: BMJ
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. BMJ.
2002 Mar;324(7337):569-73
Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination.
Gagliardi A, Jadad AR
Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Fraser Elliott Building, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
OBJECTIVE: This study updates work published in 1998, which found that of 47 rating instruments appearing on websites offering health information, 14 described how they were developed, five provided instructions for use, and none reported the interobserver reliability and construct validity of the measurements. DESIGN: All rating instrument sites noted in the original study were visited to ascertain whether they were still operating. New rating instruments were identified by duplicating and enhancing the comprehensive search of the internet and the medical and information science literature used in the previous study. Eligible instruments were evaluated as in the original study. RESULTS: 98 instruments used to assess the quality of websites in the past five years were identified. Many of the rating instruments identified in the original study were no longer available. Of 51 newly identified rating instruments, only five provided some information by which they could be evaluated. As with the six sites identified in the original study that remained available, none of these five instruments seemed to have been validated. CONCLUSIONS: Many incompletely developed rating instruments continue to appear on websites providing health information, even when the organisations that gave rise to those instruments no longer exist. Many researchers, organisations, and website developers are exploring alternative ways of helping people to find and use high quality information available on the internet. Whether they are needed or sustainable and whether they make a difference remain to be shown.
PMID : 11884320 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Anna | Gagliardi | A |
| Alejandro R | Jadad | AR |
Affiliation: Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Fraser Elliott Building, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Evaluation Studies as Topic
- Health Education - standards
- Humans
- Information Services - standards
- Internet - standards
- Observer Variation
- Quality Control
- Reproducibility of Results
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:alternative, appearing, ascertain, assess, available, comprehensive, conclusions, construct, continue, described, design, developed, developers, difference, duplicating, eligible, enhancing, evaluated, even, exist, exploring, find, five, gave, health, helping, high, identified, incompletely, information, instructions, instruments, internet, interobserver, literature, longer, many, measurements, medical, needed, new, newly, none, noted, objective, offering, only, operating, organisations, original, past, people, previous, provided, providing, published, quality, rating, reliability, remained, reported, researchers, results, rise, science, search, seemed, six, still, study, sustainable, updates, validated, validity, visited, ways, websites, whether, work, years
|