 |
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2002): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Dropping out of mental health treatment: patterns and predictors among epidemiological survey respondents in the United States and Ontario.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The authors interviewed individuals treated for self-described mental health problems in the preceding year to examine patterns and predictors associated with dropping out of treatment.
METHOD:
Subjects were drawn from respondents to community epidemiological surveys carried out in representative samples of the United States and Ontario populations. Dropouts were those who had left mental health treatment during the prior year for reasons other than symptom improvement. The surveys also assessed potential dropout correlates:
sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes about mental health care, disorder type, provider type, and treatment received.
RESULTS:
The proportion of dropouts did not significantly differ between the United States (19.2%) and Ontario (16.9%), nor did the effects of the predictors differ significantly between the two samples. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with treatment dropout included low income, young age, and, in the United States, lacking insurance coverage for mental health treatment. Patient attitudes associated with dropout included viewing mental health treatment as relatively ineffective and embarrassment about seeing a mental health provider. Respondents who received both medication and talk therapy were less likely to drop out than those who received single-modality treatments.
CONCLUSIONS:
Mental health treatment dropout is a serious problem, especially among patients who have low income, are young, lack insurance, are offered only single-modality treatments, and have negative attitudes about mental health care. Cost-effective interventions targeting these groups are needed to increase the proportion of patients who complete an adequate course of treatment.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Edlund, Mark J (MJ); Wang, Philip S (PS); Berglund, Patricia A (PA); Katz, Stephen J (SJ); Lin, Elizabeth (E); Kessler, Ronald C (RC);
Affiliation: UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Grants: MH-00507 (Agency:United States NIMH) ; MH-06501 (Agency:United States NIMH) ; MH-46376 (Agency:United States NIMH) ; MH-49098 (Agency:United States NIMH)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Journal: The American journal of psychiatry (Am J Psychiatry), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-May; vol 159 (issue 5) : pp 845-51
Dates: Created 2002/05/02; Completed 2002/06/03; Revised 2007/11/14;
PMID: 11986140, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.