|
Research article summary:
The doctors defense.
Abstract Extract: The paper takes as its point of departure a relatively recent case which attracted publicity in Britain, concerning a doctor charged with (but acquitted of) the murder of his terminally ill patient, and critically examines the criminal law of England and ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Oct
in Journal: Mt Sinai J Med
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Mt Sinai J Med.
2002 Oct;69(5):317-28
The doctor's defense.
Tur RH
Oriel College, Oxford, United Kingdom.
The paper takes as its point of departure a relatively recent case which attracted publicity in Britain, concerning a doctor charged with (but acquitted of) the murder of his terminally ill patient, and critically examines the criminal law of England and Wales relating to homicide in the context of medical practice. While similar issues obviously arise in many other countries, no comparative study is attempted in the paper. However, the arguments which have been presented are of more than local interest. From an analysis of this case and others, it appears that there is in common law something which can be called the doctor s defense. It holds that a doctor may, when caring for a patient who is suffering great pain, lawfully administer pain-killing drugs, despite the fact that, as the doctor well knows, one certain or highly probable consequence will be to shorten the patient s life. Current justifications for this defense are either incoherent or too weak. Some require that different conceptions of intention be deployed, depending on whether the agent is a doctor or not. Others rely on the philosophically controversial doctrine of double effect. Still others invoke an implausible notion of minimal causation. All these justifications apply readily enough to morally and factually easy cases, but fail in hard cases where the need for some justification is most pressing. These justifications seem incapable of providing adequate guidance to prosecutors or trial judges. Absent principled and transparent justification, the English criminal justice system exhibits different outcomes on what appear to be broadly similar facts. It is disturbing that the law is uncertain and incapable of giving adequate guidance. A doctor, compelled by conscience to intervene to end a person s life, should certainly be ready and willing to face rigorous legal scrutiny, but the law applied should not be arbitrary and random, nor should the outcome turn solely or chiefly on prosecutorial discretion or the predilections of the trial judge. The hope is to find a better rationale for the doctor s defense through an analysis of professional ethics and the concept of a recourse role.
PMID : 12415326 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Richard H S | Tur | RH |
Affiliation: Oriel College, Oxford, United Kingdom.
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Criminal Law
- England
- Ethics, Medical
- Homicide - legislation & jurisprudence
- Humans
- Intention
- Suicide, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence
- Wales
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:absent, acquitted, adequate, administer, agent, analysis, appears, applied, apply, arbitrary, arguments, arise, attempted, attracted, better, britain, broadly, called, caring, case, cases, causation, certain, certainly, charged, chiefly, common, comparative, compelled, conceptions, concerning, conscience, consequence, context, controversial, countries, criminal, critically, current, defense, departure, depending, deployed, despite, different, discretion, disturbing, doctor, doctrine, double, drugs, easy, effect, england, english, ethics, examines, exhibits, face, fact, facts, factually, fail, find, giving, great, guidance, hard, highly, his, holds, homicide, hope, ill, implausible, incapable, incoherent, intention, interest, intervene, invoke, issues, judges, justice, justifications, killing, knows, law, lawfully, legal, life, local, many, medical, minimal, morally, more, murder, need, not, notion, obviously, one, other, others, outcomes, pain, paper, patient, person, philosophically, point, practice, predilections, presented, pressing, principled, probable, professional, prosecutorial, prosecutors, providing, publicity, random, rationale, readily, ready, recent, recourse, relating, relatively, rely, require, rigorous, scrutiny, shorten, similar, solely, something, still, study, suffering, system, takes, terminally, too, transparent, trial, turn, uncertain, wales, weak, well, where, whether, who, will, willing
|