|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2003): |
Detectability of the negative event: effect on the acceptance of pre- or post-event risk-defusing actions.
Full Abstract
In risky decision situations, many decision makers search for risk-defusing operators (RDOs). An RDO is an action intended by the decision maker to be performed additionally to a specific alternative and is expected to decrease the risk. Pre-event RDOs (e.g., vaccination) have to be applied before a negative event (e.g., infection) occurs. Post-event RDOs do not need to be initiated before and unless the event happens (e.g., medical treatment). For the successful application of Post-event RDOs, the negative event must be detected in time. Two experiments investigated the effect of uncertainty in the detection of the negative event. In Experiment 1, only a small minority of subjects noted this uncertainty without a cue, and even with cue, only a minority actively searched for probability information. In Experiment 2, the probability for correctly detecting the negative event was varied. When detection was certain, most subjects chose the alternative with a Post-event RDO, whereas this percentage decreased significantly with decreasing probability of correct detection. Also, in the conditions with a more extreme negative outcome, less decision makers chose the alternative with the Post-event RDO.Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Huber, Oswald (O); Huber, Odilo W (OW);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Route de Faucigny 2, CH-1701 Fribourg, Switzerland. oswald.huber(-atsign-)unifr.ch
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Acta psychologica (Acta Psychol (Amst)), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-May; vol 113 (issue 1) : pp 1-21
Dates: Created 2003/04/07; Completed 2003/05/23; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 12679041, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.