 |
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2003): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Many college students overestimate both the drinking behaviors (descriptive norms) and the approval of drinking (injunctive norms) of their peers. As a result, consistent self-other discrepancies (SODs) have been observed, in which self-perceptions of drinking behaviors and approval of drinking usually are lower than comparable judgments of others. These SODs form the foundation of the currently popular "social norms approach" to alcohol abuse prevention, which conveys to students the actual campus norms regarding drinking behaviors and approval of alcohol use. However, little attention has been paid to the factors that can influence the magnitude of SODs. This research was conducted to address these issues.
METHOD:
This meta-analytic integration of 23 studies evaluated the influence of five predictors of SODs:
norm type (injunctive or descriptive), gender, reference group, question specificity and campus size. These studies rendered 102 separate tests of SODs in descriptive and injunctive forms, representing the responses of 53,825 participants.
RESULTS:
All five predictors were significantly related to self-other differences in the perception of norms. Greater SODs were evident for injunctive norms, estimates by women, distal reference groups and nonspecific questions, as well as on smaller campuses.
CONCLUSIONS:
More systematic attention should be given to how norms are assessed. In particular, SODs can be maximized or minimized, depending on the specificity of the behaviors/attitudes evaluated and the reference groups chosen for comparison.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Borsari, Brian (B); Carey, Kate B (KB);
Affiliation: Center for Health and Behavior, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-2340, USA.
Grants: F31-AA05571 (Agency:United States NIAAA) ; R01 AA012518-01A1 (Agency:United States NIAAA) ; R01 AA012518-02 (Agency:United States NIAAA) ; R01-AA12518 (Agency:United States NIAAA)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Journal: Journal of studies on alcohol (J Stud Alcohol), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-May; vol 64 (issue 3) : pp 331-41
Dates: Created 2003/06/23; Completed 2003/10/17; Revised 2008/06/23;
PMID: 12817821, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.