Research article summary:

Defining and managing biohazardous waste in U.S. research-oriented universities: a survey of environmental health and safety professionals.

Abstract Extract:
A survey was conducted of environmental health and safety professionals responsible for biohazardous waste management at 122 institutions. The overall response rate was 82.6 percent (100 out of 122). Results indicate that university policies for ... (Full abstract text below)

Published 2003 Jul-Aug in Journal: J Environ Health (Language : eng)

Full Pubmed Extract

This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:

1. J Environ Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;66(1):17-22

Defining and managing biohazardous waste in U.S. research-oriented universities: a survey of environmental health and safety professionals.

Mecklem RL, Neumann CM

Department of Public Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-6406, USA. Cathy.Neumann@orst.edu

A survey was conducted of environmental health and safety professionals responsible for biohazardous waste management at 122 institutions. The overall response rate was 82.6 percent (100 out of 122). Results indicate that university policies for biohazardous waste are heavily influenced by state environmental regulations, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Bloodborne Pathogens Standard, and the biosafety guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. With respect to definition of waste, 84 percent of the universities treat non-infectious human-cell-culture waste as biohazardous. Sharp items, including hypodermic needles, syringes with needles, and scalpel blades, are commonly treated (by 85 percent of universities) as biohazardous sharps regardless of contamination status. Importantly, while 90 percent of universities use autoclave sterilization for waste treatment, only 52 percent use a biological indicator to validate the process. On-site incineration is currently used by 42 percent of universities. Twenty-two of 42 incinerators are hospital/medical/infectious-waste incinerators, and 10 of these will continue to operate under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's revised incinerator regulations. Eighty-seven percent of the respondents indicated that some portion of their university's biohazardous waste is treated and disposed of through a licensed medical waste hauler (MWH). To ensure compliance with institutional policy, most universities segregate and package waste, train waste generators, and conduct inspections.

PMID : 12879576 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]

This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.

Full Author Information

First Name	LastName	Initials
Robin Lyn	Mecklem	RL
Catherine M	Neumann	CM

Affiliation: Department of Public Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-6406, USA. Cathy.Neumann@orst.edu

3rd Party provider links

Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:

MESH categories and related page links

This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.

Links for this article

For links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text.

New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts.

Here are some articles related to this one (by title keywords):

Magical ideation modulates spatial behavior.

Individual and institutional conflict of interest: policy review by research universities in the United States.

Health beliefs of college students born in the United States, China, and India.

Explaining the forgetting and recovery of abuse and trauma memories: possible mechanisms.

The development of exogenous orienting: mechanisms of control.

The current status of the anatomical sciences curriculum in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.

Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity.

How children affect the mother/victims process in intimate partner violence.

The writing approaches of secondary students.

Current status of predoctoral geriatric education in U.S. dental schools.

>>> Get more research article abstracts like these, or browse abstracts.

Keywords in this article:

administration, agency, autoclave, biohazardous, biological, biosafety, blades, bloodborne, cell, centers, commonly, compliance, conducted, contamination, continue, control, culture, currently, definition, disease, disposed, eighty, ensure, environmental, generators, guidelines, hauler, health, heavily, hospital, human, hypodermic, importantly, incineration, incinerators, including, indicate, indicated, indicator, infectious, influenced, institutes, institutional, institutions, items, licensed, management, medical, mwh, national, needles, non, occupational, operate, out, package, pathogens, percent, policies, policy, portion, prevention, process, professionals, protection, rate, regardless, regulations, respect, respondents, response, responsible, results, revised, safety, scalpel, segregate, seven, sharp, sharps, site, standard, state, status, sterilization, survey, syringes, train, treat, treated, treatment, twenty, two, under, universities, university, validate, waste, will

Also, see our new free speed reading online course (beta version)