 |
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2002): |
Decisional capacity in theory and practice: legal process versus 'bumbling through'.
Full Abstract
The reform of guardianship law and practice remains an active topic of interest for service providers, policy makers, and advocates involved with older persons. Guardianship is a legal device designed to protect persons who lack the cognitive and emotional capacity to make their own life decisions. However, for most 'grey zone' individuals and even for many who are rather clearly and severely mentally disabled, the capacity issue never gets formally raised and the legal process of guardianship (or placement in a formal guardianship diversion program) never gets invoked. Instead, the various parties generally 'bumble through' extra-legally as best they can. When the capacity issue does get raised formally, it often is done so as a matter of legal self-protection for a health care provider or financial institution, rather than primarily for the ward's benefit. The central policy issue to be debated is whether we ought to be encouraging or discouraging extralegal, bumbling through-type handling of persons with questionable capacity rather than initiation of formal judicial involvement or a formalized guardianship diversion program. A closely related issue is what we ought to be teaching health care providers, financial officers, and other third parties who in reality are usually the ones who initially decide whether the formal guardianship system should be initiated for a particular person.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Kapp, M B (MB);
Affiliation: Office of Geriatric Medicine & Gerontology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, OH 45401-0927, USA. marshall.kapp(-atsign-)wright.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Aging & mental health (Aging Ment Health), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Nov; vol 6 (issue 4) : pp 413-7
Dates: Created 2002/11/11; Completed 2003/04/30; Revised 2004/11/17;
PMID: 12425775, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.