|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2003): |
Computerizing reading training: evaluation of a latent semantic analysis space for science text.
Full Abstract
The effectiveness of a domain-specific latent semantic analysis (LSA) in assessing reading strategies was examined. Students were given self-explanation reading training (SERT) and asked to think aloud after each sentence in a science text. Novice and expert human raters and two LSA spaces (general reading, science) rated the similarity of each think-aloud protocol to benchmarks representing three different reading strategies (minimal, local, and global). The science LSA space correlated highly with human judgments, and more highly than did the general reading space. Also, cosines from the science LSA spaces can distinguish between different levels of semantic similarity, but may have trouble in distinguishing local processing protocols. Thus, a domain-specific LSA space is advantageous regardless of the size of the space. The results are discussed in the context of applying the science LSA to a computer-based version of SERT that gives online feedback based on LSA cosines.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Kurby, Christopher A (CA); Wiemer-Hastings, Katja (K); Ganduri, Nagasai (N); Magliano, Joseph P (JP); Millis, Keith K (KK); McNamara, Danielle S (DS);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA. ckurby(-atsign-)niu.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc (Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-May; vol 35 (issue 2) : pp 244-50
Dates: Created 2003/07/01; Completed 2003/08/29; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 12834079, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: comparing semantic benchmarks.
29 Apr 2004 - iSTART: interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking.
29 Apr 2004 - Moral pedagogy and practical ethics.
29 Jun 2005 - Educational technologies and the teaching of ethics in science and engineering.
29 Jun 2005 - In search of reflective behavior and shared understanding in ad hoc expert teams.
30 Mar 2004 - Open source: will you follow the cathedral or the bazaar model?
29 Apr 2005 - Teaching ethics in science and engineering: effective online education.
29 Jun 2005 - Teaching research ethics and working together--commentary on "Pedagogical objectives in teaching research ethics in science and engineering".
29 Jun 2005 - Teaching about good work by preparing well: designing online resources for ethics educators--commentary on "Moral pedagogy and practical ethics".
29 Jun 2005 - Making good use of online case study materials.
29 Jun 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.