 |
| Research article summary (published 27 Feb 2003): |
Comparison of thermal threshold tests to assess small nerve fiber function: limits vs. levels.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The method of limits (MLI) and the method of levels (MLE) are psychophysical stimulus procedures most commonly applied to quantify warm and cold sensation thresholds in humans. This paper evaluates basic methodological properties of both methods and investigates the correspondence between the method's results.
METHODS:
Warm sensation threshold was measured in 20 healthy participants using the psychophysical MLIs and MLEs. Two differently shaped kind of levels stimuli were used with triangular (TRIANG) and trapezoid (TRAP) temperature-time profile.
RESULTS:
A linear model of temperature response, based on threshold level-crossing, quantifies sensation threshold, independent of the MLI inherent 'reaction-time' artifact. It results from modeling MLI responses to warm stimuli with different rates of temperature change. The model also quantifies the reaction-time delay in the physiological system from thermal stimulus presentation until manual response. This study shows that using the reaction-time independent MLE, TRAP should preferably be used for optimal quantification of sensation threshold.
CONCLUSIONS:
Statistical testing shows that model-based MLI threshold equals MLE threshold provided MLE TRAP stimuli are used. Recommendations for optimal MLI and MLE stimulus configurations and properties are given in relation to application of quantitative sensory testing.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Reulen, J P H (JP); Lansbergen, M D I (MD); Verstraete, E (E); Spaans, F (F);
Affiliation: Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Hospital, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. jre(-atsign-)fknf.azm.nl
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
Journal: Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Clin Neurophysiol), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Mar; vol 114 (issue 3) : pp 556-63
Dates: Created 2003/04/22; Completed 2003/05/08; Revised 2008/09/10;
PMID: 12705436, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.