|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2002): |
A comparison of educational achievement in a national sample of Dutch female twins and their matched singleton controls.
Full Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the educational achievement of female twins (n = 577) and their matched singleton controls (n = 447), who were selected from participants of a national test of educational achievement in the years 1993 to 1998. To assure the representativeness of the selected groups we also compared the achievement scores of the twins and the controls to those of the total Dutch female population tested in the same period. We analyzed the results of the following educational achievement scales:
Language, Mathematics and Information Processing. The results indicated that the singleton classmates performed significantly better than the twins on all three scales. However, the twins performed equally well as compared to the Dutch female population. We believe that our singleton control group was not as properly selected as we intended, a selection bias operative at the level of the schools may have confounded the comparison. We therefore conclude on the basis of a comparison with the performance of the total Dutch female population that there are no differences in educational achievement between female twins and singletons.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Cohen, Celina C C (CC); Van Goozen, Stephanie H M (SH); Orlebeke, Jacob F (JF); Buitelaar, Jan K (JK); Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T (PT);
Affiliation: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, and the Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, The Netherlands. c.cohen(-atsign-)psych.azu.nl
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Twin Study
Journal: Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies (Twin Res), published in Australia. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2002-Aug; vol 5 (issue 4) : pp 273-6
Dates: Created 2002/09/09; Completed 2002/10/24; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12217233, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.