The clock drawing test is a poor screen for very mild dementia.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether performance on the clock drawing test varies as a function of dementia severity and particularly whether it differentiates cognitively normal older adults from those with very mild dementia.

METHODS:
Clock drawings were obtained during the initial clinical assessments of 75 participants in a longitudinal study of healthy aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type (15 cognitively normal, 25 with very mild dementia, 21 with mild dementia, and 14 with moderate to severe dementia, as staged by the Clinical Dementia Rating). Each clock drawing later was judged blindly and independently by two raters according to six commonly used sets of scoring criteria.

RESULTS:
The same pattern of results was obtained for all six scoring methods. Inter-rater reliability was consistently high. Spearman correlations indicated that as dementia severity increased, clock drawing performance decreased. Analyses of variance revealed that although those with mild or moderate/severe dementia performed significantly worse on the clock drawing test than did individuals who had very mild dementia or who were cognitively normal, the latter two groups did not differ significantly. Sensitivity and specificity analyses revealed that all methods could distinguish between normal aging and dementia of at least mild severity. However, sensitivity for detecting very mild dementia was poor.

CONCLUSION:
Although the clock drawing test can be scored reliably and can differentiate cognitively normal older adults from those with at least mild dementia of the Alzheimer type, it does not appear to be a useful screening instrument for detecting very mild dementia.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Powlishta, K K (KK); Von Dras, D D (DD); Stanford, A (A); Carr, D B (DB); Tsering, C (C); Miller, J P (JP); Morris, J C (JC);

Affiliation: Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Grants: AG 03991 (Agency:NIA NIH HHS) ; AG 05681 (Agency:NIA NIH HHS)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Journal: Neurology (Neurology), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2002-Sep; vol 59 (issue 6) : pp 898-903

Dates: Created 2002/09/25; Completed 2002/10/16; Revised 2007/11/14;

PMID: 12297574, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis; psychology
Analysis of Variance
Chi-Square Distribution
Dementia - diagnosis; psychology
Female

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.