|
Research article summary:
How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies.
Abstract Extract: Mice from the early 1990s seemed to offer a cheap and viable alternative to more expensive response boxes, with fairly consistent results being found between studies. However, has anything changed in the intervening decade? Are newer mice technologies ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2003May
in Journal: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput.
2003 May;35(2):276-84
How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies.
Plant RR, Hammond N, Whitehouse T
Department of Psychology, University of York, York, England. r.plant@psych.york.ac.uk
Mice from the early 1990s seemed to offer a cheap and viable alternative to more expensive response boxes, with fairly consistent results being found between studies. However, has anything changed in the intervening decade? Are newer mice technologies necessarily better? Is USB a better mouse interface than the old-fashioned serial interface? With such questions in mind, we outline a method for bench-testing the timing characteristics of mice outside of a PC, in order to predict their contribution to response timing. A sample set of mice was tested under a visual stimulus-response paradigm, using E-Prime to compare predicted performance with measured response registration. A representative range of mice technologies was tested alongside a standard keyboard and an E-Prime deluxe response box. The implications for using any response device other than a recognized response box are discussed.
PMID : 12834085 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Richard R | Plant | RR |
| Nick | Hammond | N |
| Tom | Whitehouse | T |
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of York, York, England. r.plant@psych.york.ac.uk
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Computers - standards
- Humans
- Materials Testing
- Psychology, Experimental - instrumentation, standards
- Reaction Time
- Reproducibility of Results
- Time Factors
- User-Computer Interface
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:alongside, alternative, anything, bench, better, boxes, changed, characteristics, cheap, compare, consistent, contribution, decade, deluxe, device, early, expensive, fairly, fashioned, implications, interface, intervening, keyboard, measured, method, mice, mind, more, mouse, necessarily, newer, offer, old, order, other, outline, outside, paradigm, pc, performance, predict, predicted, prime, questions, range, recognized, registration, representative, response, results, s, sample, seemed, serial, set, standard, stimulus, studies, technologies, tested, testing, timing, under, usb, viable, visual
|