Chest radiograph interpretation by medical students.

Full Abstract

AIM:
To assess the ability of final year medical students to interpret conventional chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Ten conventional chest radiographs were selected from a teaching hospital radiology department library that were good radiological examples of common conditions. All were conditions that a medical student should be expected to recognize by the end of their training. One normal radiograph was included. The radiographs were shown to 52 final year medical students who were asked to describe their findings.

RESULTS:
The median score achieved was 12.5 out of 20 (range 6-18). There was no difference between the median scores of male and female students (12.5 and 12.3, respectively, p=0.82) but male students were more likely to be certain of their answers than female students (median certainty scores 23.0 and 14.0, respectively). The overall degree of certainty was low. On no radiograph were more than 25% of students definite about their answer. Students had received little formal radiology teaching (2-42 h, median 21) and few expressed an interest in radiology as a career. Only two (3.8%) students thought they were good at interpreting chest radiographs, 17 (32.7%) thought they were bad or awful.

CONCLUSION:
Medical students reaching the end of their training do not perform well at interpreting simple chest radiographs. They lack confidence and have received little formal radiological tuition. Perhaps as a result, few are interested in radiology as a career, which is a matter for concern in view of the current shortage of radiologists in the UK.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Jeffrey, D R (DR); Goddard, P R (PR); Callaway, M P (MP); Greenwood, R (R);

Affiliation: Department of Clinical Radiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK. danyajeffrey(-atsign-)ukgateway.net

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Clinical radiology (Clin Radiol), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2003-Jun; vol 58 (issue 6) : pp 478-81

Dates: Created 2003/06/05; Completed 2003/07/21; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 12788318, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Female
Humans
Male
Radiography, Thoracic - standards
Radiology - education
Students, Medical

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.