|
Research article summary:
Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.
Abstract Extract: Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury, (n = 6,371). disability (n = ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2002Dec
in Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.
2002 Dec;24(8):1094-102
Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.
Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock EM, Condit DC
Center for Psychological Studies, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. wiley@nova.edu
Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury, (n = 6,371). disability (n = 3,688), criminal (n = 1,341), or medical (n = 22,131) matters. Base rates did not differ among geographic regions or practice settings, but were related to the proportion of plaintiff versus defense referrals. Reported rates would be 2-4% higher if variance due to referral source was controlled. Twenty-nine percent of personal injury, 30% of disability, 19% of criminal, and 8% of medical cases involved probable malingering and symptom exaggeration. Thirty-nine percent of mild head injury, 35% of fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue, 31% of chronic pain, 27% of neurotoxic, and 22% of electrical injury claims resulted in diagnostic impressions of probable malingering. Diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence, including severity (65% of cases) or pattern (64% of cases) of cognitive impairment that was inconsistent with the condition, scores below empirical cutoffs on forced choice tests (57% of cases), discrepancies among records, self-report, and observed behavior (56%), implausible self-reported symptoms in interview (46%), implausible changes in test scores across repeated examinations (45%), and validity scales on objective personality tests (38% of cases).
PMID : 12650234 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Wiley | Mittenberg | W |
| Christine | Patton | C |
| Elizabeth M | Canyock | EM |
| Daniel C | Condit | DC |
Affiliation: Center for Psychological Studies, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. wiley@nova.edu
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article:- Demography
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Disability Evaluation
- Expert Testimony
- Humans
- Malingering - diagnosis, epidemiology, psychology
- Neuropsychological Tests - standards
- Reproducibility of Results
- Sick Role
- Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data
| | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:across, american, annual, base, based, behavior, below, board, cases, changes, choice, chronic, claims, clinical, cognitive, condition, controlled, criminal, cutoffs, defense, diagnosis, diagnostic, differ, disability, discrepancies, electrical, empirical, estimates, evidence, exaggeration, examinations, fatigue, fibromyalgia, forced, geographic, head, higher, impairment, implausible, impressions, including, inconsistent, injury, interview, involved, malingering, matters, medical, membership, mild, multiple, neuropsychology, neurotoxic, nine, not, objective, observed, pain, pattern, percent, personal, personality, plaintiff, practice, probable, proportion, rates, records, referrals, regions, related, repeated, reported, resulted, scales, scores, self, settings, severity, source, sources, supported, survey, symptom, symptoms, tests, thirty, twenty, validity, variance, versus
|