|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2002): |
An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
Full Abstract
Three experiments show that understanding of biases in probability judgment can be improved by extending the application of the associative-learning framework. In Experiment 1, the authors used M. A. Gluck and G. H. Bower's (1988a) diagnostic-learning task to replicate apparent base-rate neglect and to induce the conjunction fallacy in a later judgment phase as a by-product of the conversion bias. In Experiment 2, the authors found stronger evidence of the conversion bias with the same learning task. In Experiment 3, the authors changed the diagnostic-learning task to induce some conjunction fallacies that were not based on the conversion bias. The authors show that the conjunction fallacies obtained in Experiment 3 can be explained by adding an averaging component to M. A. Gluck and G. H. Bower's model.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Cobos, Pedro L (PL); Almaraz, Julián (J); García-Madruga, Juan A (JA);
Affiliation: Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Spain. p_cobos(-atsign-)uma.es
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2003-Jan; vol 29 (issue 1) : pp 80-96
Dates: Created 2003/01/28; Completed 2003/05/01; Revised 2006/11/15;
PMID: 12549585, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Blickets and babies: the development of causal reasoning in toddlers and infants.
30 Oct 2006 - Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.
27 Feb 2007 - Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
30 Aug 2006 - Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.
27 Feb 2007 - Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
27 Feb 2007 - Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
27 Feb 2007 - Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
27 Feb 2007 - Language as context for the perception of emotion.
8 Jul 2007 - Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization.
30 Jul 2007 - Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing.
30 Oct 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.