|
Research article summary:
Age and task parameters in continuous performance tests for preschoolers.
Abstract Extract: 66 children (M=56.2 mo., SD=10.9), recruited from preschool and daycare centers, were administered two continuous performance tests, one auditory and one visual. Both tests utilized a format with one target and one nontarget. Interstimulus interval was ... (Full abstract text below) Published 2003Jun
in Journal: Percept Mot Skills
(Language : eng)
Full Pubmed Extract
This information was retrieved, real-time, on your behalf from the public area of the Pubmed website:
1. Percept Mot Skills.
2003 Jun;96(3 Pt 1):975-89
Age and task parameters in continuous performance tests for preschoolers.
Hagelthorn KM, Hiemenz JR, Pillion JP, Mahone EM
Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
66 children (M=56.2 mo., SD=10.9), recruited from preschool and daycare centers, were administered two continuous performance tests, one auditory and one visual. Both tests utilized a format with one target and one nontarget. Interstimulus interval was fixed at 1350 msec. for the visual test and 5000 msec. for the auditory test. The visual test produced greater rates of omission and commission errors than the auditory test. Age was significantly related to mean reaction time and response variability for both tests; however, the visual test produced an unexpected pattern of increasing response time across age groups. On both tests omission rates improved significantly with age, while commission rates were consistent across ages 3-6 years. When considering continuous performance test paradigms for preschoolers, 3-yr.-olds may need at least a 4000-msec. interstimulus interval to make a choice for the stimulus cue. Hits following an interstimulus interval shorter than 1400 msec. may reflect younger preschoolers' response to a previous stimulus.
PMID : 12831279 [PubMed - Indexed for MEDLINE]
This information is obtained from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright. Type "NLM copyright" into Google for more information.
Full Author Information
| First Name | LastName | Initials |
| Kathleen M | Hagelthorn | KM |
| Jennifer R | Hiemenz | JR |
| Joseph P | Pillion | JP |
| E Mark | Mahone | EM |
Affiliation: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
3rd Party provider links
Click the links below to go to related 3rd party information:
MESH categories and related page links
This article was linked to the MESH categories shown on the left below. The links on the right are related Memletics pages.
Category links from this article: | | Related Memletics topics: |
Links for this articleFor links to places where you can get the full text of this article see links. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. New! Using similar technology to this site, we have launched find-health-articles.com, targeting over 1 million health research article abstracts. Related ArticlesHere are some articles related to this one (by title keywords): Keywords in this article:across, administered, age, ages, auditory, centers, children, choice, commission, considering, consistent, continuous, cue, daycare, errors, fixed, following, format, greater, groups, hits, improved, increasing, interstimulus, interval, least, m=, mean, mo, msec, need, nontarget, olds, omission, one, paradigms, pattern, performance, preschool, preschoolers, previous, produced, rates, reaction, recruited, reflect, related, response, sd=, shorter, target, tests, time, two, unexpected, utilized, variability, visual, years, younger, yr
|